Structural Analysis
AI-generatedThis is a health/epidemiology market with a hard numerical threshold, which means it behaves more like a binary event market than a probability distribution — small shifts in trajectory can swing the price dramatically, and traders anchored to a 'current pace' extrapolation will consistently misprice acceleration risk (outbreaks are nonlinear, not linear). The market falls outside the standard political/sports/crypto calibration buckets, so it likely inherits general overconfidence in longshot outcomes — if this is trading as a longshot, research on Polymarket's 67% outcome-correctness and the favorite-longshot bias both suggest the crowd is likely overpricing the tail scenario.
ResolutionResolution depends strictly on the CDC's official counter, not state-level reports or media tallies — if CDC lags in aggregating state data (which it historically does), the year-end count could differ significantly from what independent trackers show near resolution, creating a brief window where the market misprices the final number. The fallback 'credible source' provision is undefined, meaning a dispute over which source qualifies could delay or complicate resolution if CDC data is temporarily unavailable at year-end.
Low volume — wider spreads, slippage possible
Price strongly directional — lower volatility expected
Exchange-standard resolution criteria
Standard manipulation risk for this market depth
Resolves in ~231d — long horizon, capital lock-up risk
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there have been the specified amount or more confirmed cases of Measles (Rubeola) in humans in the territory of the United States of America in 2026 according to the CDC case counter between January 1, 2026, 12:00 AM ET and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwi...
CalibrationLe (2026) shows all domains compress toward 50% at long horizons, meaning long-dated markets systematically underprice certainty in both directions — if the true probability is well below 50%, the market price is probably still being pulled artificially toward 50% by the horizon effect, offering edge to No traders willing to hold. Polymarket's 67% outcome-correctness rate (Clinton & Huang 2025) is the lowest of major platforms, suggesting Polymarket crowds are more often wrong than Kalshi or PredictIt — this market's price should be treated with more skepticism than its apparent consensus implies.
RisksThis market has a long horizon with daily volatility above 5%, meaning position sizing matters enormously — a trader who takes a full position early and is correct directionally can still lose money if volatility forces them out before the case count becomes clear. Measles outbreaks are geographically and socially clustered (unvaccinated communities), so the case count has fat-tail upside that's hard to model from early-year data, creating asymmetric risk for holders of the No side if a major outbreak ignites in a dense population center.